![]() |
| | |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Welcome to the Photoshop Gurus Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Heavy saturation without noise or artifacts Quote:
|
| |||
| Heavy saturation without noise or artifacts I'm can't speak for Stroker, but what I got out of iit was, give credit where due. That said, it always good to have techniques re-explored. As in this topic, it's a technique, that I have not had a use for for a couple of years and would have been messing around for ages. Thanks John1, for the refresher, keep 'em coming. ![]() |
| |||
| Heavy saturation without noise or artifacts Quote:
I took the time to share a technique that I found quite a while back and if it wasn't for Stroker I would have forgotten where I found it and I'm very honest about that. I know hundreds of these techniques (collected over the years) and in most cases I can't remember if I discovered them or if someone else did and who it was. Is that so hard to understand? \:] Geeeez, all I'm trying to do is to help some fellow Photoshop users. |
| |||
| Heavy saturation without noise or artifacts Then just share them, one by one, and teasingly slow. Hehe. Otoh: re-reading Stroker's reply, I don't even think he criticised anythiong or anyone. *I* jumped to that conclusion while all he wrote was a sign of recognition of a typical Deke McLelland technique (when you see the median, highpass, minimum and maximum filters used, you can bet it'sa master McLelland's trick). Adding to that an adress of where them good ol' video's were made available. So: John shares a technique, Stroker recognises its source and I played the lawyer (I prefer barrister, but we're not all Britons, are we?) who smelled a case. The fireman who wanted to extinguish that romantic candle. I feel so grey... |
| |||
| Heavy saturation without noise or artifacts There is some misunderstanding here Erik. My last comments were directed at Sync, that's why I quoted his comments. This has nothing to do with Stroker's post, that was a misunderstanding on my part, sorry So no need to drag this into a major drama with your closing sentence Erik |
| |||
| Heavy saturation without noise or artifacts I've been trying it on a b/w image... expected it wouldn't work because of color blending. so i tried some, i blurred the original layer 2 times, made the new layer brighter and set blending to overlay. came out pretty fine. should play some with the opacity so it won't turn out darker then the original. the result was rather blurry, so I'm still trying... if someone has a solution, add it! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |