What's new
Photoshop Gurus Forum

Welcome to Photoshop Gurus forum. Register a free account today to become a member! It's completely free. Once signed in, you'll enjoy an ad-free experience and be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Advice fixing a lighting blow out


Jessica Tracy

New Member
Messages
1
Likes
0
Hey guys!

Im new to the forum and average at photoshop, I can get around. Im looking for advice as to how to quickly get rid of the blow out in-between my boys heads and make the background more evenly lit. Thanks for your help!

DSC_7247 (2).jpg
 
Sorry colleague, I clicked the link and saw the image, I did not notice the PSD. I should have paid closer attention! Thanks.
 
Unless you intend to use the spaces above and below the children for text (eg, a Christmas card) or something else, I would crop the image much tighter, as well as straighten it out, and try to correct the barrel distortion that makes straight lines (eg, the rows of reindeer) appear to curve slightly. I also brought back some detail in the very bright areas using curves. As is, these areas would have lost even more detail when printed. Hope you like it.

Cheers,

Tom M
 

Attachments

  • hert-tjm01-ps02-01.jpg
    hert-tjm01-ps02-01.jpg
    761.3 KB · Views: 0
@Tom Mann what method did you use to correct the barrel distortion?

I'm guessing ACR Lens correction.
I tried it after the blowout was fixed. ACR lens correction, cropped and Topaz Djpg
hert.jpg
 
Last edited:
IamSam & ALB68 - Actually, in the version I posted earlier, I started with the PSD file graciously posted by Colleague. Then, I did use the distortion correction (under Lens Corrections) in an ACR adjustment layer, but, because there was what is called, "moustache distortion", in addition to simple barrel, to get all the reindeer perfectly straight, I followed that with a pass through the new "Adaptive Wide Angle" filter. It was only after I was done that I looked down at the layers already in "Colleague's" PSD file and saw that he also apparently applied the lens correction filter.

Three geometric corrections in sequence was just too much for me because doing each one slowly saps the detail out of an image at the pixel level.

So, because I also wanted to show the OP how an absolutely plain background looks, for the version below, I started with the OP's original (instead of "Colleague's" PSD file) and only needed to use one pass through the Adaptive WA filter. It just about completely corrected all the distortion in that one pass and preserved the sharpness in the original to a much greater extent.
---------

@OP - IMHO, the reindeer wallpaper background, while cute & certainly in the Christmas spirit, is much too busy from a photographic POV. It just screams, "snapshot". If you really want to use such a background, at minimum, always sit your subjects well out from the wall so that the subjects will be sharp, but the wall will be blurred from depth-of-field effects. Of course, the other option is to use a less busy background.

For demo purposes, attached below is the extreme opposite end of the spectrum with respect to visual clutter: a featureless, plain gray background. Personally, I would have gone with something in-between with respect to visual complexity, say, drapes, an very out-of-focus xmas tree, etc., but wanted you to see what a simpler background might look like.

DSC_7247 (2)-tjm03_test_adaptive_wide_angle2-acr-ps01a-01.jpg

Cheers,

Tom M

PS - Pls. ignore the lousy masking job. I didn't feel like spending any significant amount of time on it since this is only an example / demo.
 

Back
Top