What's new
By:
Photoshop Gurus Forum

Welcome to Photoshop Gurus forum. Register a free account today to become a member! It's completely free. Once signed in, you'll enjoy an ad-free experience and be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recent content by cinclodes

  1. C

    Removing star paths due to camera motion

    The images that were obtained at sea are indeed soft-focus due to the motion of the camera. The images that were obtained with the Nikon on land don't have this problem. However, some of them do show the tracks of aircraft, but I wouldn't try to filter those out. Thanks for the detailed...
  2. C

    Removing star paths due to camera motion

    Those parameters worked well in the version of Photoshop (26.3.0) that I just purchased. All of the corrected aurora images (as well as some that were taken on land and thus didn't have star trails) are now posted here.
  3. C

    Removing star paths due to camera motion

    I purchased Photoshop, and, thanks to the expertise offered here, was able to do the other photos myself. Thanks so much for the guidance!
  4. C

    Removing star paths due to camera motion

    Those are beautiful results! I'm sold on Photoshop. Is it hard to learn how to do this?
  5. C

    Removing star paths due to camera motion

    Thanks so much, Babine and Rich54. Would you please post your version, Rich54? I have never used Photoshop, but I'm going to get it on the basis of this result. The terms Radius and Threshold don't mean anything to me, but I will have to start climbing the learning curve!
  6. C

    Removing star paths due to camera motion

    During a recent sea trip to the Arctic, we had the most colorful auroras I have ever seen. Although the ship was moving, I set up a Nikon Z6ii with a 20 mm lens on a tripod to get some photos. They came out better than expected, but stars appear as complex orbits due to the motion of the ship...
See more
Back
Top