What's new
Photoshop Gurus Forum

Welcome to Photoshop Gurus forum. Register a free account today to become a member! It's completely free. Once signed in, you'll enjoy an ad-free experience and be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Reply to thread

First, I'll just point out to others that may be following along, your "Levels 1" layer is acting very much like a threshold adjustment layer acting on the noise layer immediately below, "Layer 5". 


As an example of the real source of the problem, assume you change the viewing magnification from 100% down to 33.3%.  When you do this, PS averages ~9 pixels (=3x3) to produce one pixel at the new magnification.  This happens on every layer.  Because the original noise pixels on Layer 5 are now averaged, these new pixels won't be distributed as widely in intensity as the original pixels -- more will be concentrated around mid-gray.   Therefore, fewer will make it through your thresholding operation as one reduces the viewing magnification.


To verify this is indeed what is going on, simply view your image at a wide range of magnifications.  You should see that at magnifications of 100% and any magnification above that, the number of "stars" that make it through your thresholding operation should hardly change.  However, when you start to go significantly below 100% magnification, fewer stars should appear.


The fix is easy: bake in the number of stars that you want by generating a new "real" layer of stars (ie, not an adjustment layer) at 100%.  Then, as you scale it up or down either in viewing magnification, or when turned into a jpg or a print of arbitrary size, the number of stars won't vary.


Pls. let me know how this works for you.


Cheers,


Tom


What is our favorite program/app? (Hint - it begins and ends with the letter P)
Back
Top