What's new

Photoshop Gurus Forum

Welcome to Photoshop Gurus forum. Register a free account today to become a member! It's completely free. Once signed in, you'll enjoy an ad-free experience and be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Reply to thread

Message

Actually, scratch that comment about the pixel count being equal for my aRPD layer. It turns out that they are different between 8 and 16 bit modes.

I'm reading: [TABLE="width: 76"]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]3016610px[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]3414497px[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

I wasn't too worried but this is a problem. These two number calculate to area measurements of:[TABLE="width: 62"]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]2.74cm[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]3.11cm[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

This is a pretty significant difference in describing the phenomena that we are trying to measure and could mean action taken on the ground based on faulty survey data. I have a feeling that the problem gets worse as my area gets larger.

I may have to abandon the 16 bit workflow if I can't resolve this issue, which would be a real shame...

<blockquote data-quote="sabos909" data-source="post: 1533701429" data-attributes="member: 112769">Actually, scratch that comment about the pixel count being equal for my aRPD layer.&nbsp; It turns out that they are different between 8 and 16 bit modes.&nbsp; I&#039;m reading:&nbsp;&nbsp; [TABLE=&quot;width: 76&quot;][TR][TD=&quot;align: right&quot;]3016610px[/TD][/TR][TR][TD=&quot;align: right&quot;]3414497px[/TD][/TR][/TABLE]I wasn&#039;t too worried but this is a problem.&nbsp; These two number calculate to area measurements of:[TABLE=&quot;width: 62&quot;][TR][TD=&quot;align: right&quot;]2.74cm[/TD][/TR][TR][TD=&quot;align: right&quot;]3.11cm[/TD][/TR][/TABLE]This is a pretty significant difference in describing the phenomena that we are trying to measure and could mean action taken on the ground based on faulty survey data. I have a feeling that the problem gets worse as my area gets larger.I may have to abandon the 16 bit workflow if I can&#039;t resolve this issue, which would be a real shame...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="sabos909, post: 1533701429, member: 112769"] Actually, scratch that comment about the pixel count being equal for my aRPD layer. It turns out that they are different between 8 and 16 bit modes. I'm reading: [TABLE="width: 76"] [TR] [TD="align: right"]3016610px[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD="align: right"]3414497px[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] I wasn't too worried but this is a problem. These two number calculate to area measurements of:[TABLE="width: 62"] [TR] [TD="align: right"]2.74cm[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD="align: right"]3.11cm[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] This is a pretty significant difference in describing the phenomena that we are trying to measure and could mean action taken on the ground based on faulty survey data. I have a feeling that the problem gets worse as my area gets larger. I may have to abandon the 16 bit workflow if I can't resolve this issue, which would be a real shame... [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is our favorite program/app? (Hint - it begins and ends with the letter P)

Search

Search

Reply to thread