chrisdesign
Guru
- Messages
- 4,244
- Likes
- 6,274
Welcome to Photoshop Gurus forum. Register a free account today to become a member! It's completely free. Once signed in, you'll enjoy an ad-free experience and be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
View attachment 42443:mrgreen:
A few things come to mind -
The Bugatti should be bigger by about 20-30%. It looks too low in comparison to the couple right next to it.
But I deduce you decided on that size based on the length of their lower legs? If so, move the car further up the sreet with the tires level to just below the woman's knees. This will match the lighting from the overhead lamp.
Add slight hilights/reflection to the top edges couple's hair. This is because of the streetlight above and behind them.
Darken the shadow cast by the car a bit but decrease the spread and take into consideration that the car's body will create a more solid shadow in front. And make the shadow for the couple longer towards the front and not just directly under them.
oops... looks like my "few things" turned out to be so much....... But that's just me and how I see your image......
Yes your'e right dv8_fx, but it was the "Bugatti Royal Esders".
http://www.bugattipage.com/voitures/bugatti/esders.htm
I took my pictures in the musee d' automobile in Mulhouse, France. Here another one. It's a fantastic car and also very big.
View attachment 42475
Great idea Sam with the drops, though in your posted size my first impression was "dust". If you've done the composite in my original posted size image, they do look like drops, and with the reduction got lost a little. Maybe bigger drops might be the solution?Updated version. I like the beaded drops better. View attachment 42481
I agree Chris, no matter what I've tried so far, I can't get the drops to look right when they are sized down to proportion.Chris said:Great idea Sam with the drops, though in your posted size my first impression was "dust". If you've done the composite in my original posted size image, they do look like drops, and with the reduction got lost a little. Maybe bigger drops might be the solution?
to give everyone some more ideas of a completely different approach, here is a new composite.
View attachment 42482