Very beautiful animated fire.

[Linda]

I found very beautiful animated fire created by help of Panopticum Fire plug-in on the http://www.adobefx.com/products/pictures/fire3_01.gif

http://www.adobefx.com suggests some of Panopticum filters from author directly.
As for me I have a few (3) and I like all of them.
This fire is realistic, isn't it?

 

[Tron]

Looks good Linda thanks for the info

 

[Guest]

I agree, it looks great! Thanks for sharing it with us Linda

 

[Linda]

How beautiful expression. Thanks for maintenance me

 

[Erik]

Good example of bad site: type in

http://www.adobefx.com/products/photoshop/

and you go straight to their index...

having an apache server is not sufficient...

 

[Guest]

But these are just demos if that's what you meant.

 

[Geoff]

thanks linda

 

[Erik]

It's not a question of it being demo's or not. If it weren't demo's I would never have posted this, but I would have mailed them personally.
What I mean is that it is not ok to have your own apache server and set it up so that anyone can go straight to your index files on the server. That is asking for trouble.

 

[wbiss]

Yes, Linda, the fire is "realistic" enough... but at $50 for the plug-in... I think not!

 

[Linda]

Oh, do you really think so? But I have this plug-in already. I want to hope that I have not overpaid.
Generally I'm satisfied by its working.
By the way, what is your price? [stuned]

 

[wbiss]

Linda... all I mean't by what I said was that, I, for one, don't spend that kind of money on plug-ins. But, hey, if it works for you and you're satisfied, that's all that matters! B7

 

[Erik]

Sorry, Linda: my critique on their site has nothing to do with the quality of the plugins. Hope you can post some results soon...

 

[Linda]

Have you seen their "news" picture at the news page?. It's beautiful enough. Are you agree?
As for me I don't like my own results. Because I'm only hobbyist, may be. [innocent]